<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumour: New iPod Nano on Sep. 5th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.nocr.at/mac/rumour-new-ipod-nano-on-sep-5th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.nocr.at/mac/rumour-new-ipod-nano-on-sep-5th/</link>
	<description>gadget.hacking.gaming.geek.tech</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: More shots of the Nano &#124; tech.nocr.at</title>
		<link>http://tech.nocr.at/mac/rumour-new-ipod-nano-on-sep-5th/comment-page-1/#comment-8702</link>
		<dc:creator>More shots of the Nano &#124; tech.nocr.at</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-8702</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we can&#8217;t confirm the authenticity of these photos, they do look a lot better that the previous blurry photos we had up of the supposed 3rd-generation iPod Nano. With so many rumours going around about the [...]
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('8702','More shots of the Nano | tech.nocr.at'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('8702','More shots of the Nano | tech.nocr.at','&amp;#91;...&amp;#93; we can&amp;#8217;t confirm the authenticity of these photos, they do look a lot better that the previous blurry photos we had up of the supposed&Acirc; 3rd-generation iPod Nano. With so many rumours going around about the &amp;#91;...&amp;#93;'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

